We live in a world of new green buildings.
We’re building green apartments, green condos, green malls, green museums.
And we’re getting better at it every year.
But, we’re missing something else: the next generation of green building.
And as we grow up, we should expect to see more and more green buildings, more green apartments and more and better green museums and art spaces.
In fact, we are already seeing green building and green apartments grow more rapidly than the average U.S. building population.
In 2018, there were 9,890 green apartment units in New Jersey, up from 8,724 units in 2018.
And, over the next two years, that number will climb to 12,400, and 13,000 in 2019, according to the U.K.-based architecture firm Green Builders.
That’s a lot of green apartments.
But it’s also a lot less than what the average American building has in it.
According to the National Association of Home Builders, only 2% of American homes are currently designed with a green facade.
That figure is roughly half of what the United States has in terms of its housing stock.
That doesn’t even include the 1% of buildings that have been built with retrofitting techniques, which is an even larger percentage.
And those buildings aren’t going to be green for very long.
A decade from now, there will be about half the American population living in homes with a glass facade.
So, there’s no shortage of green buildings around the country.
And the reason is that the world is changing, and the world wants to live in buildings that are more environmentally friendly.
The United States is already at the top of the pack in terms for green buildings with its total number of green housing units and green buildings built in 2018, according the Building Industry Association.
And it’s not just California or New York that’s making huge gains.
In addition to New Jersey and New York, there are now six other states that have more than 1,000 green housing projects in place, according data compiled by the Center for Sustainable Energy at The University of Texas at Austin.
California and the District of Columbia have nearly 300 projects each.
In contrast, Hawaii, Texas and Utah have about 200.
There are more than 3,400 projects in the United Kingdom, and in 2019 the average number of buildings with a solar roof was only 2.6%.
And in the U, the average percentage of buildings where solar was used to power the roof was just 0.8%.
There are some big differences between the United states and the rest of the world, though.
The U. S. has about 5,500 green buildings on its landmass, compared to the United Arab Emirates with nearly 8,000.
The European Union, meanwhile, has nearly 2,000, while Australia has only about 700.
But there’s a big difference between the U and the other countries: In the United Nations, the Green Building Council has said that every green building should have a green roof, while the International Solar Alliance has said building with a carbon footprint of 20% or more should be considered a green building if it has a solar-powered roof.
But the reality is that we’re not getting there.
The global average carbon footprint for new green housing is 1.3%.
That’s about 0.6% of the U!s total building.
This is an issue because many green building programs are geared towards low-carbon projects.
So the amount of green projects in U.s. cities is much lower than the global average.
In some cases, they are just building small green buildings that don’t have enough space to be considered green, like an apartment building that has a roof that is 20% carbon.
But many of these projects don’t even have the space to make it carbon-neutral.
For example, a typical apartment building in Los Angeles has more than 4,000 square feet of space, compared with about 1,200 square feet in New Orleans.
And that doesn’t include any green spaces, such as the rooftop garden.
The fact that the U S. is not making up ground in terms on the carbon footprint is due in large part to how it has built its housing.
Most of the construction projects in New America are built on land that already has been developed for the construction of low-density housing, and so they don’t create a green footprint.
In New York City, for example, more than 40% of new housing built between 1990 and 2018 has been built on top of a landfill.
That has created a lot more land for building green buildings and green roofs.
But a lot still has to be done.
The number of new projects that are not green is expected to grow by 2,700 over the coming decade, according The New York Times.
And there’s been no shortage when it comes to green building design.
Green building is